Cookie 5.0.4

Posted on  by

Cookie

Cadets collected a sample of 42 bags of Chips Ahoy! Cookies, bought from locations all across the country to verify this claim. The cookies were dissolved in water and the number of chips (any a t=: = 7 = For each R problem, turn in answers to questions with the written portion of the homework. Writing articles is perform well. Formulating Joy and happiness Seth’s Blog website Of your amazing thinking of Jon Morrow, expert consultancy teaching you how to build a remarkable blogging site will depend on substantial simply writing and marketing methods, remarkable appreciate and building interactions for the influencers in your niche.

Emoji Meaning

A golden-brown chocolate chip cookie, or biscuit, though representing the baked treat more generally. Samsung, which features a pair of cookies, previously displayed this as two saltine crackers.

Cookie was approved as part of Unicode 6.0 in 2010and added to Emoji 1.0 in 2015.

Copy and Paste

Also Known As

  • 🍪 Biscuit
  • 🍪 Chocolate Chip Cookie

Apple Name

🍪 Cookie

Codepoints

Shortcodes

  • :cookie:(Github, Slack, Emojipedia)

See also

Browse

Proposals

Cookie 5.0.4 pro
  • 🍪 Cookie Emoji Proposal:L2/07-257,L2/09-026
Cookie 5.0.4

More

Cookie 5.0.4 game

External Links

EFFECTIVENESS OF GLUTEUS MAXIMUS FASCIA PLASTY FLAP FOR CLOSURE OF WOUND IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PILONIDAL DISEASE

  • Authors: Kitsenko Y.E.1, Shlyk D.D1, Tulina I.A1, Markaryan D.R1, Tsarkov P.V1
  • Affiliations:
    1. I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
  • Issue: Vol 24, No 5 (2018)
  • Pages: 233-236
  • Section: Articles
  • URL:https://journals.eco-vector.com/0869-2106/article/view/38455
  • DOI:https://doi.org/10.18821/0869-2106-2018-24-5-233-236

Aim: to compare short- and long-term results of primary midline closure and gluteus maximus fascia flap plasty after pilonidal sinus excision. Method: retrospective analysis included consecutive patients who had primary and recurrent pilonidal sinus excised. Patients with gluteus maximus fascia flap plasty formed 1st group, patients with primary midline closure formed 2nd group. Gluteus maximus fascia flap plasty technique: (i) separation in lateral directions of both gluteus maximus fascia from muscle and subcutaneous tissue; (ii) mobilised fascia flaps are brought together to midline and sutured; (iii) subcutaneous fat and skin sutured. Results: 60 patients operated in 2007-2016 were included: 28 in 1st group, 32 in 2nd group. Groups 1 and 2 didn’t differ in operation time (41.9±4.0 and 37.3±3.1 min, p=0.4), blood loss (6.9±0.5 and 8.3±1.6 ml, p=0.2), draining rate (7.1% and 12.5%, p=0.5), hospital stay (11.8±1.3 and 9.1±1.0 days, p=0.1), time to complete wound epithelialization (1.2±0.2 and 1.5±0.4 months, p=0.37). Mean follow-up was 20.7±3.2 and 53.8±6.5 months respectively. Recurrence rate was significantly lower in gluteus maximus fascia flap plasty group (3.6%) than in the 2nd group (21.9%, p=0.04). Conclusion: gluteus maximus fascia flap plasty after pilonidal sinus excision is feasible, doesn’t increase postoperative complications rate and leads to a lower recurrence rate compared to midline closure.

Keywords


Yury E. Kitsenko

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Email: kitsenko@kkmx.ru
119991, Moscow, Russian Federation
assistant professor, Department of surgery, faculty of preventive medicine “I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)”, 119991, Moscow, Russian Federation

D. D Shlyk

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

119991, Moscow, Russian Federation

I. A Tulina

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

119991, Moscow, Russian Federation

D. R Markaryan

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

119991, Moscow, Russian Federation

P. V Tsarkov

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

119991, Moscow, Russian Federation

  1. Sondenaa K., Andersen E., Nesvik I., Soreide J.A. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. International journal of colorectal disease. 1995; 10(1): 39-42.
  2. Chintapatla S., Safarani N., Kumar S., Haboubi N. Sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: historical review, pathological insight and surgical options. Techniques in coloproctology. 2003; 7(1): 3-8.
  3. Clothier P.R., Haywood I.R. The natural history of the post anal (pilonidal) sinus. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 1984; 66(3): 201-3.
  4. Дульцев Ю.В., Ривкин В.Л. Эпителиальный копчиковый ход. М.: Медицина; 1988
  5. Iesalnieks I., Furst A., Rentsch M., Jauch K.W. [Primary midline closure after excision of a pilonidal sinus is associated with a high recurrence rate]. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen. 2003;74(5):461-8. In German.
  6. Hosseini S.V., Rezazadehkermani М., Roshanravan М., Muzhir Gabash К., Aghaie-Afshar М. Pilonidal Disease: Review of Recent Literature. Ann Colorectal Res. 2014; 2.
  7. Iesalnieks I., Ommer A., Petersen S., Doll D., Herold A. German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease. Langenbeck’s archives of surgery. 2016; 401(5): 599-609.
  8. Karydakis G.E. Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery. 1992; 62(5): 385-9.
  9. Enriquez-Navascues J.M., Emparanza J.I., Alkorta M., Placer C. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different techniques with primary closure for chronic pilonidal sinus. Techniques in coloproctology. 2014; 18(10): 863-72.
  10. Arslan S., Karadeniz E., Ozturk G., Aydinli B., Bayraktutan M.C., Atamanalp S.S. Modified Primary Closure Method for the Treatment of Pilonidal Sinus. The Eurasian journal of medicine. 2016; 48(2): 84-9.
  11. Царьков П.В., Кравченко А.Ю., Тулина И.А., Лукьянова Е.С. Способ ушивания раны крестцово-копчиковой области. Патент 2604768. 2016
  12. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of surgery. 2004; 240(2): 205-13.
  13. McCallum I.J., King P.M., Bruce J. Healing by primary closure versus open healing after surgery for pilonidal sinus: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2008; 336(7649): 868-71.
  14. Tavassoli A., Noorshafiee S., Nazarzadeh R. Comparison of excision with primary repair versus Limberg flap. International journal of surgery. 2011; 9(4): 343-6.
  15. Nursal T.Z., Ezer A., Caliskan K., Torer N., Belli S., Moray G. Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing V-Y advancement flap with primary suture methods in pilonidal disease. American journal of surgery. 2010; 199(2): 170-7.
  16. Elshazly W.G., Said K. Clinical trial comparing excision and primary closure with modified Limberg flap in the treatment of uncomplicated sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease. Alexandria Journal of Medicine. 2012; 48(1): 13-8.

Cited-By


Article Metrics

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.